Antifolate antibodies: another reason for pregnant women to take folic acid
Serum from 12 women who were or had been pregnant with a fetus with a neural tube defect (cases) and from 20 control women with current or prior normal pregnancies was analyzed for antibodies against human placental folate receptors. Serum from 75% of cases, compared with only 10% of controls, contained antibodies against folate receptors (p < 0.001). These antibodies blocked the binding of folic acid to folate receptors on placental membranes and blocked the uptake of folic acid by a human carcinoma cell line.
Comment: Periconceptional administration of folic acid reduces the incidence of neural tube defects (NTDs) in the offspring. This benefit occurs among pregnant women who have no clinical evidence of folic acid deficiency, suggesting that some women have a higher-than-normal requirement for folic acid that cannot be met by a typical diet. Part of this increased requirement may be explained by genetic variations in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase allele; however as less than 20% of humans have the variant allele, that factor alone cannot explain the 70-80% reduction in NTDs that results from folic acid supplementation. The current study indicates that a high proportion of women who give birth to a child with a NTD have anti-folate antibodies which may block the uptake of folic acid by the placenta, thereby depriving the fetus of adequate amounts of the vitamin. Presumably, this impaired uptake can be overcome by increasing the amount of folic acid ingested.
The importance of folic acid supplementation prior to and during pregnancy has been amplified by recent evidence that folic acid taken during the first 6 weeks of gestation may reduce the incidence of congenital heart defects (ventricular septal defects and conotruncal defects) by more then 50% (Fam Pract News, December 15, 2003, p. 10.).
Rothenberg SP, et al. Autoantibodies against folate receptors in women with a pregnancy complicated by a neural-tube defect. N Engl J Med 2004;350:134-142.
